Outside in (extra)ordinary screenteriors in the era of virtual public interiority
Main Article Content
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic has placed immense value on our interior settings and their respective objects. As a result, interior spaces, augmented with virtual streams of data, are becoming instrumental settings for everyday activities. Such a state engenders new thinking regarding interior space, one in which private settings are understood as primary nodes for public exchanges. The implications of this new environment are all-encompassing, positioning the most intimate places and objects at the core of improvised virtual communities and subjecting private spaces to rapid retooling to address unfamiliar urgencies. The resulting condition is one of amalgamated physical and virtual parameters, often with discordant assemblies. Central to this unfolding state of affairs, technology has emerged as an indispensable medium. The legibility of our settings through digital devices has led to a new type of processed interior space; fragmented and dispersed across various localities, it is unified through its reading within the boundary of the screen.
This article presents a set of graphic reflections on computer-screen interiors, coined screenteriors. While this new public interior was courtesy of a global pandemic, it is here to stay. Screenteriors are set within our intimate places and privy to various facets of our everyday lives. They are transmitted in real-time and often recorded on distant storage clouds, scrambled at times, subject to delays and freezes, filtered, and modified at will, streamed back and forth between recipients and devices, and always under the gaze of the camera. Here and now, a new interior emerges where screens frame and interpolate a new typology of space.
Article Details
Author/s and or their institutions retain copyright ownership over works submitted to idea journal, and provide the Interior Design / Interior Architecture Educators Association with a non–exclusive license to use the work for the purposes listed below:
- Make available/publish electronically on the idea journal website
- Publish as part of idea journal's online open access publications
- Store in electronic databases, on websites and CDs/DVDs, which comprise of post-publication articles to be used for publishing by the Interior Design / Interior Architecture Educators Association.
Reproduction is prohibited without written permission of the publisher, the author/s or their nominated university. The work submitted for review should not have been published or be in the process of being reviewed by another publisher. Authors should ensure that any images used in their essays have copyright clearance.
References
"01 Elisabeth A. Grosz and Peter Eisenman, ‘Cyberspace, Virtuality, and the Real: Some Architectural Reflections,’ In Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006), 76.
Grosz and Eisenman, ‘Cyberspace, Virtuality, and the Real,’ 76.
William John Mitchell, City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2010), 43.
Mitchell, City of Bits, 43.
Lois Weinthal, ‘Dress Codes,’ Harvard Design Magazine
, S/S 2019, http://www. harvarddesignmagazine.org/ issues/47/dress-codes.
Weinthal, ‘Dress Codes.’
‘Bio,’ About page, Lucy McRae website, Accessed January 25, 2021, https://www.lucymcrae. net/about.
Beatriz Colomina and Mark Wigley, Are we Human? Notes on an Archaeology of Design (Zurich: Lars Müller Publishers, 2016), 16.
Antoine Picon. ‘Architecture and the Virtual Towards a New Materiality,’ PRAXIS: Journal of Writing Building 6 (2004): 118."