Main Article Content
Framing the open letter as an expanded interior-in-the- making, this visual essay documents a participatory experiment that took place between the cities of Sheffield (UK) and Gothenburg (SE). The experiment, as one of critical spatial practice, attempted to foster a temporal atmosphere of reparation which aims to counter the global condition of paranoia produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. This essay articulates the visual design of the experiment, the theoretical principles which underpin it, and the significance of critical reflection in the process. The experiment is intentionally left inconclusive, establishing an open networked approach towards publishing as a way of making public, and subsequently allowing the authors to invite readers to contribute to future iterations. As a way of rethinking the visual essay form, the essay deliberately blurs the line between image and text and their relation with the spatial structure of the page.
Author/s and or their institutions retain copyright ownership in the works submitted to the IDEA Journal, and provide the IDEA Journal of the Interior Design Interior Architecture Educators Association with a non–exclusive license to use the work for the purposes listed below:
- Made available/published electronically on the idea journal website
- Published as part of the idea journal online open access publication
- Stored in the electronic database, website, CD/DVD, which comprises post publication articles to be used for publishing of the Interior Design Interior Architecture Educators Association.
Reproduction is prohibited without written permission of the publisher, the authors or their nominated university. The work submitted for review should not have been published or be in the process of being reviewed by another publisher. Authors should ensure that any images used on the paper have copyright clearance.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; or, You’re so Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction is About You EVE KOSOFSKY SEDGWICK’, in Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction, ed. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997), 17.
Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Paranoid Reading’, 9.
Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Paranoid Reading’, 7. Original emphasis.
Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Paranoid Reading’, 4.
Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Paranoid Reading’, 25.
Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Paranoid Reading’, 6.
Kosofsky Sedwick, ‘Paranoid Reading’, 24.
Jane Rendell, ‘Seven Problematics for Neoliberal Times’, in Apolonija Sustersic Selected Projects 1995-2012, ed Peio Aguirre (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2013).
Oliver Marchart, Conflictual Aesthetics Artistic Activism and the Public Sphere (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2019), 87.
Legacy Russell, Glitch Feminism - A Manifesto (London: Verso, 2020), 11, 29-29.
Bruno Latour, ‘Networks, Societies, Spheres: Reflections of an Actor-Network Theorist’, International Journal of Communications, no.5 (2011): 800.
Manuel Castells, ‘Communication is Power (2009)’, in Networks Documents of Contemporary Art, ed. Lars Bang Larsen (Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, Whitechapel Gallery, 2014), 182.
Erin Manning, Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009).
Jane Rendell, ‘Critical Spatial Practice as Parrhesia’, MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research 1(2), no. 16 (13 December 2016): 1–8, https://doi.org/10.5334/mjfar.13.
Sushma Subramanian, How to Feel - The Science and Meaning of Touch (New York: Columbia University Press, 2021).
Sara Ahmed, What’s the Use? On the Uses of Use (Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2019), 3.
J.K. Gibson-Graham, ‘Diverse Economies: Performative Practices for “Other Worlds”,’ Progress in Human Geography 32, no. 5 (1 October 2008): 613-32.